The Clarity Act sets off a crypto civil war! ADA founder Hoskinson angrily denounced "death traps", but WisdomTree said "the rules are enough"! The cryptosphere is completely torn apart!

Оригинальный автор：AI说区块链

Первоисточник：https://www.youtube.com/embed/yR_ACHxg7KU

The "Clarity Act" has triggered fierce controversy in the encryption industry. The core is the default securities terms, the ban on stable currency income and developer responsibilities. Hoskinson warned that supervision may be "weaponized" by politics, and the positions of existing projects within the industry and traditional financial institutions are divided. U.S. regulation is mired in partisan games, while the European Union and Singapore have formed clear frameworks. Investors should turn to compliance capability assessment and be wary of policy cycle risks. The encryption industry is moving from a technology movement to a compliance industry. 👉[Content Outline] ✅ Regulatory Trojan Horse Controversy ✅ In-depth dismantling of the core provisions of the bill ✅ Analysis of interest differentiation within the industry ✅ Risk warning of political weaponization ✅ Evolution of the global regulatory competition landscape ✅ Market impact and investment strategy [Previous Highlights Videos] https://youtu.be/oGB1Km7Z6uQ https://youtu.be/apXWRSOtBUo https://youtu.be/2FK9w_o4XkY https://youtu.be/-CJkRb1grV4 https://youtu.be/rPnkYOWoVLw https://youtu.be/5QfPttRzizY https://youtu.be/t_PrpA1Z6x8 https://youtu.be/YT15eTI3Cto https://youtu.be/oTQLi4YyVqg https://youtu.be/53QKVwk047U https://youtu.be/4z5kuu4kyFE [Main content of this video] The "Clarity Act" is an important legislative attempt for encryption supervision in the United States. It was originally intended to provide clear legal boundaries for digital assets, but it has caused fierce controversy within the industry. Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson publicly warned that the bill could be "weaponized" by future lawmakers and become a tool for partisan politics to attack specific projects. He criticized the bill for treating all new projects as securities by default, setting up extremely high barriers to entry, and including developer liability clauses, which may have a "chilling effect" on the open source ecosystem. What is even more worrying is that the ban on stablecoin income directly threatens the core business model of the DeFi ecosystem, causing Circle's stock price to plummet 20% in a single day. There are clear divisions within the industry. Early builders represented by Hoskinson fiercely opposed the bill, believing that it was the "colonization" of the crypto world by traditional finance; while traditional financial institutions such as WisdomTree believed that existing rules were sufficient and the bill was not necessary. Behind this disagreement is the reshaping of the interest pattern - existing projects are trying to consolidate their advantages through regulatory rules, while new projects face the risk of being marginalized. From a macro perspective, encryption regulation has been deeply involved in American partisan politics. From the severe suppression by the Democratic Party after the collapse of FTX to Trump’s definition of it as a “strategic technology industry” after taking office, the fate of crypto assets is closely tied to the political cycle. This bundling may cause future regulatory policies to fluctuate violently with regime changes, posing concerns for the long-term stability of the industry. At the same time, global regulatory frameworks such as the European Union's MiCA, Singapore's MAS, and Japan's FSA have formed a clear system. If the United States cannot formulate rules that are compatible with international standards, it may be reduced from an encryption leader to a regulatory island. For investors, the dimension of competition in the regulatory era has shifted from technological innovation to compliance capabilities. Global asset allocation, focusing on cross-jurisdictional compliance projects, and maintaining sensitivity to political cycles have become key strategies to deal with policy risks. Regardless of the final fate of the bill, the crypto industry is moving from an “anti-establishment movement” to a “compliance industry,” a fundamental shift that will profoundly affect the market landscape in the next five to ten years. [Note⚠️, cryptocurrency is a high-risk investment, and you may lose all your principal. If you don’t understand it, it is recommended not to participate. This video does not have any investment advice, it is only for information sharing] Become a member of this channel to enjoy the following benefits: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV1mqrHkQoDaK6dWed5g8KQ/join