Elon Musk's 130-day mission as the head of DOGE has officially come to an end, leaving many with opinions about his stepping down and the system he accused of undermining reform.

埃隆·马斯克（Elon Musk）担任总督负责人的130天任务已正式结束，许多人对他的辞职以及他指控破坏改革的制度发表了意见。

Musk, known for his involvement in electric vehicles and space exploration, took on the role of reviewing and reducing government institutional budgets, aiming to align spending with national interests and provide taxpayers with relief. However, his initiative faced criticism for its ambiguity and incompleteness.

马斯克（Musk）以参与电动汽车和太空勘探的参与而闻名，他扮演着审查和减少政府机构预算的作用，旨在使支出与国家利益保持一致，并为纳税人提供缓解。但是，他的主动性因其歧义和不完整而面临批评。

As Musk completed his 130-day mission, he expressed gratitude for the opportunity to reduce wasteful spending and emphasized that his departure should not stop the mission he defined, stating that the DOGE mission will only strengthen over time as it becomes a way of life throughout the government.

当马斯克完成130天的任务时，他表示感谢有机会减少浪费的支出，并强调他的离开不应停止他定义的任务，并指出，随着时间的流逝，Doge任务只会随着时间的推移而加强，因为它成为整个政府的一种生活方式。

However, there is some ambiguity surrounding his departure, at least because certain government initiatives, in his view, do not actually help DOGE fulfill its function. In particular, on CBS Sunday Morning, he said:

但是，围绕他的离开存在一些歧义，至少是因为他认为某些政府倡议实际上并不能帮助履行其职能。特别是，在周日早晨，他说：

"I was disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, not just decreases it, and undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing."

“坦率地说，看到大量的支出法案，我感到很失望，这增加了预算赤字，而不仅仅是减少了预算赤字，并破坏了总督团队所做的工作。”

This was commented on by Walter Isaacson, author of the biography Elon Musk, who noted that Musk's criticism wasn't personal but aimed at the broader system.

传记埃隆·马斯克（Elon Musk）的作者沃尔特·艾萨克森（Walter Isaacson）对此进行了评论，他指出，马斯克的批评不是个人的，而是针对更广泛的系统。

"He is frustrated that even the Republicans in the House and the Senate have been captured by Washington interests."

“他感到沮丧的是，即使是众议院和参议院的共和党人也被华盛顿的利益所抓获。”

Isaacson also addressed claims about how beneficial Musk's position in government was for his businesses.

艾萨克森还谈到了关于马斯克在政府中对他的业务的有益地位的主张。

"Whether it's him taking over Twitter or dealing with Tesla's crisis or SpaceX, you see that all-in intensity. Sometimes it works. Sometimes it doesn't. But he's all-in."

“无论是他接管Twitter还是处理特斯拉的危机或SpaceX，您都会看到全力强度。有时候它有效。有时效果不佳。但是他全力以赴。”

Moreover, The Guardian noted that the position may have even harmed his business, as Musk entered the administration seen as a "tech genius" and "titan of the age," but was left with a damaged reputation, particularly in the eyes of investors and the general public.

此外，监护人指出，当马斯克进入政府被视为“技术天才”和“时代的泰坦”时，该职位甚至可能损害了他的业务，但在投资者和普通大众的眼中却受到了损害的声誉。

Can Elon Musk's initiative to review and reduce government institutional budgets be called necessary? Arguably yes. According to many, certain expenses did not align with national interests, and taxpayers had a right to express frustration over this.

埃隆·马斯克（Elon Musk）审查和减少政府机构预算的主动性是否可以被称为必要？可以说是的。根据许多人的说法，某些费用与国家利益不符，纳税人有权对此表示沮丧。

But was it unequivocal and successful? Unfortunately not. Whether the targeted budget reduction was achieved remains debatable, and the negative consequences - at least for Elon Musk himself - are quite evident.

但是它是明确和成功的吗？不幸的是不是。是否实现目标预算的降低仍然值得商bat，至少对于埃隆·马斯克本人而言，负面后果很明显。