Economist and gold supporter Peter Schiff, who is a long-time vocal critic of Bitcoin, never misses a chance to criticize the digital asset even amid its increasing adoption and success. However, in a surprising turn of events that keeps resurfacing in crypto circles, Schiff previously claimed that Dogecoin, a meme coin born as a joke, was a “better” cryptocurrency than Bitcoin.

經濟學家和黃金支持者彼得·希夫（Peter Schiff）是比特幣的長期發聲批評者，從未錯過批評數字資產的機會，甚至在其不斷增長的採用和成功中。但是，在令人驚訝的事件中，席夫（Schiff）以前聲稱，迪格幣（Dogecoin）是一個笑話的模因硬幣，比比特幣（Bitcoin）是“更好”的加密貨幣。

A History Of Bitcoin Criticism

比特幣批評的歷史

Schiff’s disdain for Bitcoin is no secret. Frequently poking fun at the primary cryptocurrency, he calls it “fool’s gold” and predicts its eventual downfall in social media posts and interviews.

席夫對比特幣的鄙視不是秘密。他經常在主要的加密貨幣上開玩笑，稱其為“愚人的黃金”，並預測其在社交媒體帖子和訪談中的最終失敗。

The economist maintains that Bitcoin is driven by speculation rather than use, has no intrinsic value, is too volatile to be a store of wealth, and he claims that the hype about Bitcoin is false and deceitful to new investors.

這位經濟學家認為，比特幣是由投機而不是使用的驅動，沒有內在的價值，太波動了，無法成為財富的存儲，他聲稱關於比特幣的炒作是虛假的，對新投資者有欺騙。

Even as Bitcoin gains more institutional recognition, being spotted on company balance sheets and even granted legal tender status in nations like El Salvador, Schiff remains undeterred. He still maintains that gold is a better hedge against economic uncertainty and inflation than a “digital token invented out of thin air.”

即使比特幣獲得了更多的機構認可，被發現在公司資產負債表上，甚至在埃爾·薩爾瓦多（El Salvador）等國家授予法定招標地位，Schiff仍然沒有被忽視。他仍然堅持認為，與“從稀薄的空氣中發明的數字代幣”相比，黃金是對經濟不確定性和通貨膨脹的更好的對沖。

The Dogecoin Contradiction

狗狗幣矛盾

Ironically, Schiff appears to favor Dogecoin over Bitcoin in earlier remarks—not because he supports the principles of Dogecoin but rather as a way of parodying Bitcoin’s value proposition.

具有諷刺意味的是，席夫（Schiff）在早期的講話中似乎比比特幣（Bitcoin）更喜歡狗狗幣（Dogecoin），而不是因為他支持狗狗幣的原理，而是作為模仿比特幣價值主張的一種方式。

During a heated argument on Twitter, Schiff stated that while both are speculative, Dogecoin is “a better crypto than Bitcoin,” pointing out that Dogecoin doesn’t claim to be digital gold.

在Twitter上的激烈爭論中，Schiff表示，儘管兩者都是投機性的，但Dogecoin“比比特幣更好”，指出Dogecoin並不聲稱自己是數字黃金。

According to his argument, Dogecoin’s open stupidity made it less deceitful than Bitcoin, which he sees as attempting to pass for a real financial instrument.

根據他的論點，Dogecoin的開放性愚蠢使它沒有比特幣的欺騙性，他認為這是試圖通過真正的金融工具。

While this was meant to be sarcastic, critics have not let go of this contradiction. Would Schiff cancel out Bitcoin as worthless? And how could a meme coin with an unlimited supply be deemed “better” in any sense?

儘管這本來是諷刺的，但批評家並沒有放棄這種矛盾。 Schiff會消除比特幣是毫無價值的嗎？在任何意義上，如何將具有無限供應的模因硬幣視為“更好”？

Is Schiff Ignoring The Bigger Picture?

希夫無視大局嗎？

Schiff’s remarks highlight a broader misinterpretation, or deliberate dismissal, of how value derives in the crypto realm. Unlike gold, Bitcoin’s value stems from its scarcity, decentralization, and expanding network effect, not physicality.

希夫的言論突出了更廣泛的誤解或故意解僱價值在加密貨幣領域中的衍生方式。與黃金不同，比特幣的價值源於其稀缺，權力下放和擴大的網絡效應，而不是物理性。

It lacks the functional edge, with Dogecoin having no institutional support, global remittance use cases, and capability as a hedge in underdeveloped nations. While enjoyable and community-driven, Dogecoin is famously inflationary and has significantly fewer application cases.

它缺乏功能優勢，而Dogecoin沒有機構支持，全球匯款用例以及能力作為欠發達國家的樹籬。 Dogecoin雖然令人愉悅且以社區為導向，但著名的通貨膨脹率卻大大減少。

Dogecoin survives on internet culture and celebrity endorsements, especially from figures like Elon Musk. Schiff’s attempt to juxtapose the two simply showcases a bias ingrained in ideology rather than the changing financial reality.

Dogecoin在互聯網文化和名人代言上倖存下來，尤其是從埃隆·馬斯克（Elon Musk）等人物中。席夫（Schiff）將兩者並列的嘗試只是展示了意識形態根深蒂固的偏見，而不是不斷變化的財務現實。

The Market Remains Skeptical

市場仍然持懷疑態度

Although Peter Schiff is still among the most outspoken critics of Bitcoin, his contradictory stance praising Dogecoin to make a point has inadvertently undermined his credibility in the debate. While criticism is healthy, neglecting to acknowledge Bitcoin’s ongoing significance and expansion runs the risk of being out of touch.

儘管彼得·希夫（Peter Schiff）仍然是比特幣最直言不諱的批評者之一，但他矛盾的立場稱讚狗狗幣提出的觀點並無意中削弱了他在辯論中的信譽。雖然批評是健康的，但忽略承認比特幣的持續意義和擴張卻有失去聯繫的風險。

Whether Schiff will ever change his tune remains to be seen. However, even the most ardent critics may now have to revise their claims as Bitcoin continues to shape global financial systems.

席夫是否會改變他的曲調還有待觀察。但是，隨著比特幣繼續塑造全球金融體系，即使是最熱心的批評家也可能不得不修改其主張。